Radon
I am familiar with radon. It is a radioactive gas produced by decaying uranium deposits underground and is particularly prevalent in some parts of this country but not mine. It has been linked to cancer especially in significant exposures and if one has comorbidities like being a smoker. The gas is heavier than air so tends to collect in basements of houses which are prevalent in my part of the world. But in this part of Iowa, radon isn't listed as being abundantly around and is more hit and miss in nature. One house can have a problem and another 100 yards away won't. One of the old farmhouses I spent my later teens in had a radon problem but my parents had a mitigation system put in to bring it down to safer levels.
When we moved into this house some twelve plus years ago, testing for radon did cross my mind but since this house, as with both houses I've owned, had a walk out basement. In my mind, it meant that any heavier than air radon that accumulated in the basement would simple exit or leak out the walk out door like we do and not build up in significant amounts to reach mouth/inhalation level. However, due to the recent diagnosis of my wife and a conversation with a friend, the topic of radon came up again and I decided perhaps I should test things just to be safe.
I bought a detector online and when it was delivered to my house, I plugged it in down in the basement and waiting the required 10 minutes for the first reading. It came up and was 0.9 picocuries per liter, well underneath the 4.0 threshold set by the EPA. So I meandered upstairs and was doing other things when I heard some sort of alarm going off in the basement. Long story short(er), it was the radon detector and over the course of several weeks, I could see that our radon levels were averaging from 4.0 picocuries per liter to 10.0 picocuries per liter, all over the EPA's threshold.
We don't spend a lot of time in our basement but it is where my office/exercise room is located along with our wood stove which we use on select weekends throughout winter. Probably most importantly in my mind, due to the bedroom swap of a couple years ago, it is the location of the bedroom of my eldest daughter who although spends most of the year these days at college but will be back for summer break at some point and does like to stay holed up in her bedroom all day versus doing things with her parents! I certainly didn't want her to get dosed with higher than necessary levels of radon. So I called a radon mitigation guy in my area and made an appointment.
It is quite simple to mitigate for the gas. They drill a hole in your basement floor, stick a pipe down in it that gets sealed and vented to the outside via a powerful fan. The fan creates a vacuum of sorts underneath your foundation and pulls the radon up and out through the vent before it has a chance to seep in through your concrete floor. Above you can see the white pipe stuck into the hole in our concrete floor near(ish) to the center of our house. Below, is the fan mounted to the outside of the house and the vent stack where the radon gas will be expelled into the wild again where I think natural levels are around 0.4 picocuries per liter in these parts. Meanwhile, a valuable lesson was learned that one really shouldn't procrastinate about such things or make assumptions that a particular house is immune to such things. I hope I don't have to move anytime soon, but should I have to, I will definitely be taking my new little detector along with me to verify the radon levels first thing instead of waiting for another 12 years to do so.
This is something that is completely new and foreign to me. Good catch and solution.
ReplyDeleteYou Canadians are the source of radon as glaciers crossing your country dug up the uranium deposits and deposited them across wide swaths of our country upon their retreat. But I don't hold that against you!
DeleteI have procrastinated and now I will get a tester. The next door neighbor has one of those boxes on the house so I don't know why I haven't gotten on it. Thank you for posting about this.
ReplyDeleteYour part of Iowa is hit or miss like mine. The heavier concentrations are in central and western Iowa. Hopefully your tester shows you don't need such a system.
Deleteoff to look for a detector thanks.
ReplyDeleteAlthough I'm not one for more regulations, it would make sense to have radon testing as part of a house sell/purchase transaction like they test septic tanks and other things.
DeleteWhat an interesting post! I've heard of radon, but never thought of testing for it. Of course in my area there aren't many basements and the majority of our house is on a slab.
ReplyDeleteArkansas, especially the southern 75% of the state, is in the "don't worry about it part of our country. The glaciers didn't get that far south and thus didn't leave behind deposits of uranium near the surface like it did in Iowa. The northern tier or two of counties on the west side of the state does show a better likelihood on the map I've been studying but still well below remediation levels. I suspect the Ozark mountains may have something to do with that. Also, unless you have a basement, I don't think it is ever a worry.
DeleteHmmm, being on a island I think we are safe from radon.
ReplyDeleteAt least islands that weren't under glaciers at some point in Earth's history.
DeleteGlad you had an easy solution. We do have a basement, on the same level as our garage. We store a lot of stuff there but it is not finished out for living space.
ReplyDeleteThe radon map I've been looking at has a hot spot covering most of central Tennessee, for reasons I don't know why. Perhaps there are natural uranium deposits there?
DeleteI knew about radon but not any detail. Thanks for filling things in.
ReplyDeleteYou are most welcome. Knowledge is power.
DeleteA certain area of WA where Hanford sits is high in radon but western WA is low. It's not something I've ever thought about so thanks for alerting me to it.
ReplyDeleteMy impression was that there aren't a lot of basements in Washington which does mitigate the risk considerably.
DeleteInteresting post, Ed, with wise advice. Like Kelly, I live in an area where basements are rare. When we bought the house, we were told radon wasn't a problem. Maybe because we're in the south too.
ReplyDeleteBoth things help you out and from what I know, make it not likely to be a problem in your area.
DeleteFascinating post, Ed. I too am Canadian....Montreal, and am so glad you don't hold this against us. You have a very nice blog 😊
ReplyDeleteI've only had good experiences with Canadians. I can't say that with my own countrymen.
DeleteI remember reading about dangers from radon but it always seemed like such a vague, abstract risk that I never much thought about it. I wonder if we have radon in England? I don't even know.
ReplyDeleteI do remember reading that in Florida, some houses built with natural stone back in the early 1900s are just loaded with radon. I suppose I always figured that because mine was much more modern it wouldn't be at risk.
Google assures me there is a slight risk in parts of England of radon. I don't know my historical geography of England but I'm guessing they got theirs from the glaciers just like we did.
DeleteGlad you caught this. It looks like the fix isn't to crazy expensive. I recall years ago talking to a guy at work who's house fell out of excrow (here in S CA where there are no basements) because of high radon readings in the garage. Makes me wonder why they even tested for it in the first place, since it's generally not a problem here.
ReplyDeleteThe newer systems are relatively inexpensive. The old system that went into our old farmhouse was pretty expensive because it involved breaking through the concrete and digging a trench on the basement floor perimeter before piping it out.
DeleteAreas where there are a lot of granite (like here) radon can be a problem. We have monitored it and generally it says down below .1, but when there was a nearby earthquake it jumped up. It also tends to go up when it's raining or there are pressure changes, but seldom reaches .4. We have a passive radon system put in when the house was built and I had one put in our addition (where they run pipes around the edge of the foundation in stone to collect the radon and to send it above the roof). It's something I wish I had checked earlier, too.
ReplyDeleteFrom my understanding, anything under 4.0 meets U.S. recommendations and anything below 2.8 meets European recommendations so you are well beneath both limits.
DeletePopping in here from Midlife Thoughts Bob's blog and this post caught my attention. When we sold our house three years ago, a radon test was requested by the buyer, and while I don't recall the number, it was high enough that we needed to fix the situation. Before that, we had lived in the house for 23 years in blissful ignorance. We agreed to pay for it to be done per the buyer's contingency. On the buying end, we ended up with a nice one-story house with a beautifully encapsulated crawl space and a very nifty radon mitigation system already in place. On the outside, like yours, it practically blends right into the house trim!
ReplyDeleteI probably would have continued to live in ignorant bliss if not for my wife's recent bout with cancer which is what brought the conversation to the forefront.
Delete