My Yorkshire Pudding

 

Above is the tombstone for Ann Chicken which I had to probe though the pine needles and other debris to eventually find and unbury. I had known that it was there by previously seeing an online picture that had been taken by someone else and posted on the genealogy website Find-A-Grave. According to the credits, it had been posted on their site in 2016 but judging by the severe deterioration between my photo above taken in 2018, I suspect it had been taken many many years earlier. It says:

Ann
Wife of Joseph Chicken
Was Born
Aug 10, 1812
Died
(Here is where the tombstone is broken obscuring what had been etched into it)

Frances
Daughter of
J & A Chicken
Born
Apr 10, 1851
Died
Feb 11, 1858

At the time, I didn't know much about Ann and up until recently, still hadn't. But now that it is cooling off a bit and outside work slowing down, I decided to remedy that. I didn't know much about my 4th great grandmother other than her name was Ann and that she died sometime in the 1860's. She is found in the 1860 United States Federal Census but by 1870, her husband and my 4th great grandfather Joseph Chicken, was already remarried to Mary Jane Commins. If you recall, I wrote about his life and rather gruesome demise back in March of last year.

So I started my search by looking for more information on their children, specifically death certificates which usually list the name and place of birth for both of the deceased's parents. Two of her children listed her last name as Brittan/Britton and place of birth as Heinsbey and Hemsbey, England. I cursory search on google told me neither of those towns existed but I didn't put much stock in google for my knowledge of English geography is severely lacking when it comes to the micro scale.

I started casting a wider net, searching for Ann Britton's born in 1812 in England and perhaps hit paydirt. According to my genealogy research site, there were a half dozen born around that time but only one specifically born on 10 Aug 1812 and she was born in Helmsley, YORKSHIRE, England. This matches up well to the 1841 England Census when she and Joseph were living in Evenwood, Durham, England which lists Ann as not being born in the county of Durham along with a couple of her older children. Evenwood and Helmsley are roughly 45 miles away from each other.

The Yorkshire born Ann Britton was second daughter to John Britton, a carpenter, and Elizabeth Frank Britton and they had five other children James, Robert, Elizabeth, Simon and Margaret. I am slowly looking into their lives to find more ties that bind this family to my 4th great grandmother but English records of that period are hard to be use. Most other family trees with this family end them have the lives of all the children but Ann mapped out but Ann disappears. This would jive well with marrying a Chicken and moving to America. 

But one thing brings me pause and stops me from popping the cork on the champaign bottle. Joseph and Ann Chicken would had seven children starting with the eldest ones birth in 1831. I have located one marriage record for Joseph Chicken and an Ann Brittain but it lists their marriage date as 25 Nov 1837. This is six years after the birth of their first child, three years after their second and one year after their third. Having not one but three children out of wedlock would be a first for me in all my years of genealogy research. Of course, the marriage record is an index record meaning that it has been transcribed from an original record and thus opens the possibility of error, which is definitely something that I have found before in transcribed records. 

So the jury is still out for now. 

**********************

A side note on the title for those who aren't in the know. Yorkshire Pudding is the blog of Mr. YP of Sheffield, Yorkshire, England, the only person I know from that area. He lives a fair distance away from Helmsley and as far as I know, isn't related to us Chickens over here in America but does share a bit of our humor. 


Comments

  1. I knew there was a blog called that although it is not on my list.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He is linked in "My Reading List" listed on the sidebar of my blog.

      Delete
  2. I can hear the excitement in your writing when you find this little nuggets, Ed. Similar to me finding a new thing in History that suddenly makes a connection. It is the best feeling in the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It makes me feel closer to them when I know more than just a name. Now I have a place that I can see on a map and perhaps one day visit.

      Delete
  3. But wouldn't that be interesting if you and YP did turn out to be distantly related!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not sure. YP might consider it an insult to be related to a Yankee!

      Delete
    2. I would be okay about having an Iowan cousin as long as his initials were not DJT.

      Delete
  4. Dates and names are so tricky when doing genealogy. I also hate that so many of the same names were re-used. It makes it challenging! I would doubt that 3 children were born out of wedlock. Could it have been 1827? She would have been very young.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Most likely, it was 1830 based upon how things worked and that the last number was inserted as a 7 instead of a 0. Someday, I need to research where the information for the index actually came from and see if I can get a copy of the original document. In my experience, it is fairly common for indexes to be full of errors, from names to numbers.

      Delete
  5. The marriage date could be 1827 ? That would have made her at age 15 when she got married...transcriptions are sometimes very hard to read. Three children out of wedlock would be almost impossible:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My feeling is that it isn't true either about three children out of wedlock. It could also be that there was another unknown marriage that the original three children were born from and that while they may have considered Ann Britton their mother, she may not have been biologically. It is hard to say without seeing the original record.

      Delete
  6. I am just saying but, if you wanted to, you could say you shared some chicken nuggets with us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We Chicken descendants are particular sensitive to chicken related jokes and so as a rule, never share our nuggets!

      Delete
  7. And to think, I clicked here expecting a recipe.

    There is something quite humorous (or should I say humourous?) in the wording of she disappeared after she married a Chicken and moved to America.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As my grandfather would probably say, I wouldn't know Yorkshire Pudding from a hole in the ground!

      No comment on the Chicken reference.

      Delete
  8. Sorry I took so long to read this Ed. Genealogy searches can be like exploring remote parts of The Amazon Rain Forest. Helmsley is a lovely little town on the southern edge of The Yorkshire Moors. It might be worth checking it out courtesy of Google Streetview. I guess the Brittons may have moved to Evenwood for work as there was a colliery there. By the way, I would rather be a Chicken than a Turkey or a Skunk.
    (Thanks for the shout out.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the additional information. I will add Helmsley to my growing list of places I need to visit the next time I am in your country.

      Delete
  9. I expected a story about pudding too. But Joseph Chicken? Good gosh! That's quite a story. I'm just so amazed at all you've learned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I look back at the path I've traveled and I am blown away of how far I have come.

      Delete
  10. How interesting to find the Yorkshire connection! I wonder if Joseph and Ann Chicken were in fact married in 1827 rather than 1837. (I see that Far Side of Fifty also said this above -- I wondered about the 15-year-old bride as well, but I guess it's not out of the question.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just based on my experience with a hundred plus different ancestral families, I would say highly unlikely. Generally baby number one always arrived about a year after marriage, less than two years at the outside. This means 1830 to 1831. I also rarely find two numbers transcribed wrong though one number is fairly common. But the only way to prove it completely would be to someday find the actual record.

      Delete

Post a Comment